SC rejects govt plea to appoint new Islamabad IG

ISLAMABAD: Supreme Court Thursday rejected government's plea regarding appointment of new Islamabad Police's Inspector  General.A three-jugde bench headed by Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar heard the plea filed by Attorney General Khalid Javed on behalf of the government.The Attorney General requested the court to allow the appointment in view of law and order situation.The CJ told him that the government should give charge to an Additional IG instead of appointing new Inspector General. "Government will have to appoint someone, even if we hadn't issued orders," he was quoted by Geo News as having told the AG.The CJ remarked that the state must fulfill its responsibility to maintain law and order.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2EVjeVk
via IFTTT

Uzbekistan FM Abdulaziz Kamilov arrives in Islamabad today

ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister of Uzbekistan Abdulaziz Kamilov arrived in the capital on Thursday for a one-day visit to the country. As informed by the foreign office spokesperson, the Uzbek FM will have a meeting with his Pakistani counterpart Shah Mehmood Qureshi succeeded by delegation-level talks, reported Radio Pakistan. Kamilov is also expected to call on PM Imran Khan. Pakistan and Uzbekistan enjoy favourable bilateral relations based on mutual trust and understanding. A day earlier, PM Imran and FM Qureshi also met with Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif Khonsari to discuss relations between the two countries and matters of mutual interest.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2yJNSv9
via IFTTT

Asia Bibi acquittal: PM Imran Khan convenes emergency cabinet meeting

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan has convened an emergency federal cabinet meeting for today (Thursday). As informed by sources, the meeting will be aimed at discussing  the  country’s current political and economic situation. The cabinet will also be given a briefing over PM Imran’s China visit. “The current situation in the country following a Supreme Court verdict acquitting Asia Bibi, a Christian woman sentenced to death over blasphemy allegations, is also expected to be discussed,” sources said. Tensions have gripped major parts of the country owing to the ongoing crisis after a Supreme Court ruling overturning Asia Bibi’s death penalty led to protests from religious hardliners. Roads have been blocked and educational institutes have been closed due to the protests. PM Imran in his address made on Wednesday supported the SC verdict and warned extremists against inciting terror across the country. "It is our duty to protect property, to keep roads open and to keep people safe. The state will then exercise its power if you so as much even decide to incite any kind of violence at a time when the whole country is trying to rise together. Don’t force us into taking action," Khan warned."The despicable language used by a small section of the society against the military and judiciary is utterly deplorable. Such language is used by the enemies of a state," he added. "Those who are inciting people to violence for their political objectives should be rejected. I appeal to you not to start a confrontation with the state.""Don't cause any harm to this country for your petty politics and vote. If you do this, rest assured state will perform its responsibility of life and property of the people," the prime minister said.   

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2qmd2vj
via IFTTT

Fact check: Is this a photo of Israel's PM Benjamin Netanyahu in Pakistan?

A photo that appears to show Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meeting his Pakistani counterpart Imran Khan has gone viral following rumours a plane from Israel had landed in Islamabad on October 25. A reverse image search found the photograph has been doctored. The original picture shows Khan meeting a Pakistani official. Netanyahu’s head has been superimposed on top.The viral Facebook post is captioned: “If Israeli plane did not come to Pakistan, then how this Israeli … came at Pakistani soil. A question does arise". It contains a photo which appears to show Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meeting Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan at his office in Islamabad.The photo was created by editing an earlier official photo of Khan in his office.On the Pakistani prime minister’s official Facebook page there is a photograph of Khan meeting a former chief of the country’s spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence.Khan is seen presenting Lieutenant General (retired) Naveed Mukhtar with a shield during a farewell meeting at the prime minister’s office in Islamabad.The Prime Minister office’s official website also posted a press release on October 22, 2018 about the farewell meeting between Khan and Mukhtar.In the viral image, the former intelligence chief's head has been replaced with an image of Netanyahu’s face.The image went viral after Israeli newspaper Haaretz’s Avi Scharf tweeted on October 25 that an Israeli jet had flown from Tel Aviv to Islamabad International Airport. The Pakistani government denied the claim saying: “Civil Aviation Authority has categorically rejected any news regarding landing of Israeli Plane in Pakistan.”Pakistan and Israel do not have diplomatic relations and Pakistan's President Arif Alvi said recently there were no plans to establish ties.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2AF1Hwk
via IFTTT

?Anyone can kill me?: Asia Bibi lawyer says after verdict

Barrister Saif-ul-MulookISLAMABAD: After saving condemned Christian Asia Bibi from the gallows in Pakistan, her lawyer says he is facing the wrath of extremists -- and wonders who will save him.But despite the threats against him, Saif-ul-Mulook says he regrets nothing, and will continue his legal fight against intolerance.Mulook’s latest victory saw the freeing of Asia Bibi -- a Christian woman convicted of blasphemy, who spent nearly a decade on death row -- after the Supreme Court overturned her conviction Wednesday."The verdict has shown that the poor, the minorities and the lowest segments of society can get justice in this country despite its shortcomings," he told AFP immediately after the verdict."This is the biggest and happiest day of my life."Demonstrations against the ruling erupted across the country hours later.Mulook said he feels he is now a sitting duck with no security or escape plan."I think I have absolutely no safety. No security and I am the easiest target... anybody can kill me," he said.The defence of Bibi was just the latest in a long line of controversial cases taken up by the barrister.In 2011, Mulook was the lead prosecutor against Mumtaz Qadri over the assassination of Punjab governor Salman Taseer -- a prominent critic of the country’s blasphemy laws and supporter of Bibi.Qadri -- one of Taseer’s bodyguards -- gunned down his boss in broad daylight, citing the governor’s calls for reform of the blasphemy laws as his motive.Mulook said he took on the case as others cowered, fearing reprisals from extremists.His prosecution resulted in the conviction and subsequent execution of Qadri, who was feted by Islamists and later honoured with a shrine on the outskirts of Islamabad.Mulook says his life has not been the same since; he rarely socialises, lives in a constant state of hypervigilance and has been inundated with threats."If you conduct such cases you should be ready for the results and the consequences," the greying 62-year-old explains.But Mulook said the risks have been worth the reward."I think it’s better to die as a brave and strong man than to die as a mouse and fearful person," he said."I extend my legal help to all people."

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2SyB17r
via IFTTT

Two killed, nine injured in New Karachi firing

KARACHI: Two people were killed  nine others sustained   injuries following armed clash between two groups in new Karachi late on Wednesday.According to details, all the dead and injured were immediately rushed to the Abbasi Shaheed Hospital. The law enforcers cordoned off the area and launched the investigation into the matter.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2AEugdm
via IFTTT

Educational institutes to remain closed across Punjab today

LAHORE: Schools and colleges across Punjab will remain closed today (Thursday) in the wake of countrywide protests after the Supreme Court acquitted Asia Bibi in the blasphemy case.According to the Punjab Education Department, all government schools will remain closed. Separately, All Pakistan Private Schools Association also announced that schools would remain closed today (Thursday).The Punjab Higher Education Department has also directed the universities to remain closed on Thursday in view of the security situation, according to the recent inputs.A number of private schools and colleges have already announced holiday for Thursday. These include Beaconhouse School, City School, British Grammar School, The Punjab School, Bloomfield School, Lahore Garrison School, among others.KARACHIA private school body has announced that it may not open schools in Karachi on Thursday in view of the poor law and order situation.“We will be forced to keep our schools closed tomorrow if security situation remains unchanged,” the Private School Association said in a statement on Wednesday. “We will be forced to keep our schools closed tomorrow if security situation remains unchanged,” the Private School Association said in a statement on Wednesday. The association called on the Sindh Education Department to announce the closure of schools.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2Q8yWxj
via IFTTT

UN welcomes SC?s ruling to overturn Asia Bibi's death sentence

UNITED NATIONS: The United Nations on Wednesday  welcomed Pakistan’s Supreme Court decision to acquit Asia Bibi after accepting an appeal against  her sentence.Asia Bibi was convicted  and sentenced to hang in 2010 after being accused of blasphemy. On Wednesday, Chief Justice Saqib Nisar overturned her conviction, ordering her to be freed if she was not accused of any other crime.Responding to a question at the regular noon briefing in New York, UN Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq said the world body has a “standard policy” against imposition of death penalty.“In line with that policy, we welcome the decision of Pakistan’s Supreme Court,” he added. Beyond that, Farhan Haq said he had no comments.Meanwhile, leading rights groups also welcomed the Supreme Court's verdict  to acquit Asia Bibi. On the other hand, some religious parties have launched countrywide protests, against the acquittal of Asia Bibi, swarming  the streets in all major cities, including Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi where key roads were closed down.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2ADkgAY
via IFTTT

PM Imran Khan's address to nation over Asia Bibi protests lauded

KARACHI: Prime Minister Imran Khan addressed the nation today (Wednesday) hours after the protest erupted against the acquittal of Asia Bibi.PM Imran Khan warned agitators that state will not be cowed down by threats and will fulfill its responsibility of protecting the life and property of people.After the address people took to twitter to praise Khan for his timely and sensible address.“A bold, logical and beautiful speech by Prime Minister Imran Khan on important issue after Supreme Court judgement on Asia bb. Its good to see PM come forward to take the bull by horns. PM raised valid & relevant points. I hope everyone will support prime minister on this issue.” wrote Rauf KlasraFormer Provincial Assembly member and Global Goodwill Ambassador, Irum Azeem Farooque wrote, “That’s Our Hero. Our own #ImranKhanPrimeMinister Khan, Today is a day all Peace loving, law abiding Citizens should be so proud of this courageous man who spoke for all the Pakistanis .Bravo @ImranKhanPTI”Ameer Abbas wrote, “Indeed #PMIKAddress was an address of a statesman communicating to its ppl heart to heart. #ImranKhanPrimeMinister didn’t mince words, spoke with clarity & vociferously. He has imparted strong message that Pak is not a leaderless state as he appeared himself in crisis as a leader.”One twitter user writes, “First time in the history of #Pakistan we have the rulers Alhamdulillah who do not hide themselves in such situations.”Another user appreciating the style of the speech wrote, “Timely speech by our own Prime Minister. Gentle, bold and meaningful words by the most wise leader.”People are showing respect to Khan for his attempt to maintain peace in the country, “Prime Minister @ImranKhanPTI Massive Respect for you,”

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2SxEe7f
via IFTTT

Petrol prices increased by Rs 5 per litre

ISLAMABAD: The government has increased petroleum product prices effective from November 01, Geo News reported.Petrol price has been increased by Rs5 per litre, diesel Rs6.37 per litre, light diesel by Rs6.48, kerosene oil by Rs3 per litre.With the current increase, the petrol will retail at Rs97.83 per litre, diesel at Rs112.94 per litre and kerosene oil at Rs86.50 per litre.Ministry of finance has approved the summery moved by ministry of petroleum on the recommendations by OGRA.Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) had recommended Rs9 per litre increase in petrol, Rs13 per litre for diesel, Rs6.5 per litre for kerosene oil and light diesel Rs6.48 per litre.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2qkWqUP
via IFTTT

PM expresses concern over continued conflicts among Muslim countries

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan Wednesday expressed his concern over deficiency of unity and continued conflicts among the Muslim countries and lamented the humanitarian crisis being faced by the people of Yemen.He was talking to Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran Dr Javad Zarif who called on him, PM office media wing in a press release said.The prime minister offered his personal mediation to help resolve the crisis in Yemen, if all parties concerned agreed to this mediation.During the meeting, bilateral relations as well as regional and international issues of mutual interest were discussed.The visiting Iranian minister conveyed personal greetings and commitment of President Rouhani to work closely with Prime Minister Imran Khan for further strengthening bilateral cooperation between the two countries.Reciprocating President Rouhani’s message, Prime Minister Imran Khan reiterated his desire to further strengthen the political and economic relations with Iran.The prime minister said improving relations with all the neighbouring countries was one of his government’s key foreign policy priorities.He conveyed his best wishes for the leadership and the people of Iran.Iranian foreign minister was on an official visit to Islamabad.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2qnYsUd
via IFTTT

China, Pakistan attach great importance to PM Imran Khan's visit: Chinese foreign ministry

BEIJING: Both China and Pakistan attach great importance to Prime Minister Imran Khan's visit and Beijing believes the leaders of the two countries will have an in-depth discussion on issues of mutual interest, Chinese foreign ministry said.To question Chinese foreign ministry spokesman said this is Pakistan's Prime Minister first official visit to China after he took office. "Both China and Pakistan attach great importance to this visit and we believe the leaders of the two countries will have an in-depth discussion on issues of mutual interest.""With the concerted efforts of the two sides, this visit will surely inject a strong boost to China-Pakistan relations," the spokesman said and added China and Pakistan are all-weather strategic cooperative partners, and our bilateral relations will not be affected by any changes in the international and domestic landscapes."Regarding the issue of the CPEC, I have taken similar questions here for many times. The Pakistani government and all sectors of its society have made it clear that the CPEC is a cooperation project for mutual benefit and plays an important role in improving people's livelihood and driving Pakistan's economic development."The assertion that the CPEC is causing financial and debt problems for Pakistan has been stirred up by some people every now and then. But the Pakistani side already made it clear that debts incurred by the CPEC only account for a very small portion of Pakistan's total debts and it is not a reason why Pakistan is experiencing financial difficulties, he said."If the two sides talk about the CPEC during PM Imran Khan's visit, it will be about how the two sides will work together to firmly advance the CPEC."

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2Dfus5q
via IFTTT

PM Imran, COAS Gen. Bajwa discuss prevailing security situation: sources

ISLAMABAD: Chief of Army Staff, General Qamar Javed Bajwa called on Prime Minister Imran Khan at PM House Office, sources said.Sources said PM Imran and General Bajwa discussed prevailing security situation of the country.The meeting was held shortly after PM Imran addressed the nation  and  warned agitators that state will not be cowed down by threats and will fulfill its responsibility of protecting the life and property of people."The despicable language used by a small section of the society against the military and judiciary is utterly deplorable. Such language is used by the enemies of a state," Khan said while addressing the nation in the wake of Asia Bibi's acquittal by the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Khan's address came hours after Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan staged protest sit-ins across Pakistan against the Supreme Court's decision to acquit Asia Bibi, a Christian woman, who was sentenced to death in 2010 for alleged blasphemy. "I appeal to the people to not give in to them because they are simply trying to increase their own vote bank. To the faction making these threats, I am telling you do not take the state on."

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2DgWTjx
via IFTTT

PTI govt making efforts to bring Dr Afia Siddiqui back to Pakistan, says Shireen Mazari

Islamabad: Dr Fauzia Siddiqui, the sister of Dr Afia Siddiqui has called on the Federal Minister for Human Rights Dr Shireen M Mazari here in Islamabad on Wednesday.They discussed the ways how to move ahead getting Dr Afia Siddiqui back in Pakistan. Talking to Siddiqui, the Federal Minster said that we were trying our best to bring Dr Afia Siddiqui back to Pakistan. Dr Mazari said we are well aware of the problems and anguish of Dr Afia Siddiqui’s family and assured her full support in their struggle for her sister's release.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2qmvYtY
via IFTTT

World savings day observed on Wednesday

ISLAMABAD: World Savings Day was celebrated around the globe including Pakistan to increase the public’s awareness of the importance of savings.Celebrated around the world, the day aims to promote the virtues of putting money aside.The World Savings Day was established at the International Savings Bank Congress (World Society of Savings Banks) in Milano, Italy on October 31, 1924. The Italian Professor Filippo Ravizza declared this day the “International Saving Day”.Also called ‘World Thrift Day’, the World Savings Day was established to promote savings all over the World.Originally the idea was to educate families, children and thereby the whole society to save and particularly convince them of the importance of saving.Today, banks and financial institutions around the world, celebrated World Savings Day to increase the public’s awareness of the importance of savings both for households and for the country’s economy.They conducted lectures through highlighting topics such as: Why saving is important, the history of World Savings Day, the role of savings in the national economy and how every depositor contributes to its development.The most well-known element of the World Savings Day is the “Sparefroh” in Austria.Sparefroh, the official mascot of saving, is particularly active on the World Savings Day.‘Sparefroh’ literally means ‘Happy Saver’, or rather “Save Happily!” In the 1970s, the ‘Sparefroh-Journal’, an educational magazine for younger people, reached a circulation of 400,000 copies.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2AEuOjD
via IFTTT

Amir Khan meets CJP Saqib Nisar, speaks about dam funds

Islamabad: Pakistani origin British boxer Amir Khan called on Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar here on Wednesday.Amir Khan discussed with the Chief Justice about dam funds. He also the CJP their Manchester UK fund raising event on 26th November.Amir who is in Pakistan with family took to Twitter to share about his meeting with Pakistan's top judge."Lovely to see Pakistan Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar in Islamabad today. We spoke about water dam funds and how we will help. We invite Chief Justice to our Manchester UK fund raising event on 26th November. Keep up the good work Mian Saqib Nisar."Earlier, Amir Khan called on Prime Minister Imran Khan and  expressed wishes to play a key role in promoting boxing in Pakistan.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2OhzSxI
via IFTTT

Private school associations announce school closure on Thursday

KARACHI: A private school body has announced that it may not open schools in Karachi on Thursday in view of the poor law and order situation. “We will be forced to keep our schools closed tomorrow if security situation remains unchanged,” the Private School Association said in a statement on Wednesday. Separately, All Pakistan Private Schools Association also announced that schools would remain closed tomorrow (Thursday).The decision to close schools comes as protests broke out in several cities of Pakistan against the acquittal of Asia Bibi.The association called on the Sindh Education Department to announce the closure of schools.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2SziaJu
via IFTTT

'Justice has been done': Pakistan´s Christians laud acquittal of Asia Bibi

Islamabad -Pakistan´s beleaguered Christian community rejoiced Wednesday at the acquittal of Asia Bibi, who spent years on death row for blasphemy, saying their prayers had been answered after years of begging for justice.Christians make up around two percent of the country´s 210 million population and have long been discriminated against in Muslim majority Pakistan, often living in downtrodden slums and forced to work menial jobs.Wednesday´s acquittal of the illiterate mother represented a rare victory for the community -- with Christians in Pakistan´s capital Islamabad hailing the Supreme Court´s decision."Justice has been done," said Reverend Javed Masih, who heads a Presbyterian church in a Christian slum in the capital."We are happy that the law is still ruling in this country and that´s why Asia Bibi has been set free," added another Christian resident Shafaqat Masih.A few hours after the announcement of the verdict, life continued as usual in one of Islamabad´s impoverished "Christian colonies" -- sandwiched in between the capital´s wealthiest neighbourhoods where many of the residents work as cleaners and cooks."We are extremely happy that God has responded to our prayers. The church of Pakistan was praying for years for the release of our sister," Reverend Masih added, saying a special worship service was being held this evening to celebrate Bibi´s imminent release.- Eight years on death row -The allegations against Bibi date back to 2009, when she was working in a field and was asked to fetch water.A row later erupted after two fellow Muslim labourers refused to share the water with Bibi, citing religious differences. The argument escalated as insults were traded with the women later accusing Bibi of committing blasphemy during the exchange.Bibi was later convicted and sentenced to death in 2010."She was innocent and she was being discriminated [against]," said the pastor.Christians like Bibi are frequently targeted by accusations of blasphemy -- a dangerous charge where even a mere whiff on an allegation has sparked lynchings.Critics of Pakistan´s controversial blasphemy laws have long claimed that the legislation has been used to settle personal vendettas and target religious minorities.Bibi was set for immediate release following the ruling, however, authorities had yet to confirm if any security arrangements were being prepared for her protection or if she was planning to leave Pakistan.Pakistani human rights activist Tahira Abdullah called for "state protection" of the acquitted along with her family and attorney.As thousands of protesters took to the streets in major cities across the country to demonstrate against the ruling Pastor Masih acknowledged unrest could be triggered by the court´s decision.But he said his community would "pray for peace in this country".Shahbaz Ashiq, another resident in the neighborhood, said he was "very proud of our Supreme Court and the decision"."If she had not been acquitted, then we would have thought that there is no justice in this country," added Shafaqat Masih."Thank God that the court has acquitted her."

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2EQiqRl
via IFTTT

Rs 8 billion transactions made through rickshaw driver's bank account

KARACHI: In a series of fake bank accounts, transactions of whopping Rs8 billions have been made through an account of Karachi's rickshaw driver, it has learnt.Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has served notice to Karachi's rickshaw driver namely Zor Talab Khan for making transactions worth billions of rupees in the name of Salar Enterprises and Salar Mining.The fake accounts were opened in various private banks of Karachi and Buner.According to FBR, the account of rickshaw driver was being used by Ammar Khan, adding that Rs4.60 billions transactions was made through one private bank and Rs3.60 billion from another.FBR has summoned the driver for respond in money laundering and tax evasion charges.Ammar Khan will also be served notice soon, the officials said.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2CVNBZh
via IFTTT

PM Imran Khan will address the nation shortly: Fawad Chaudhry

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan will address the nation shortly,  Information and Broadcasting Minister Fawad Chaudhry announced on Tuesday. This comes hours after the acquittal of Asia Bibi  by the Supreme Court in a blasphemy case sparked nationwide protests by supporters of Tehreek-e-Labain Pakistan (TLP). Bibi, a Catholic mother of five, was sentenced to death by a trial court in Novembe 2014 on charges of making derogatory remarks about Holy Prophet (PBUH). Four years later, her appeal was also rejected by the Lahore High Court. She then filed an appeal in the Supreme Court which held a single day hearing on October 8 and reserved its verdict. A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar today delivered a landmark judgment, acquitting Bibi of charges of blasphemy. The apex court set aside her conviction and ordered her immediate release from prison. Shortly after the verdict, TLP supporters and activists took to the streets across Pakistan, burned tyres and blocked major roads. There is no word from any government official about the law and order situation in the country. According to sources, the prime minister will take the nation into confidence about Bibi's verdict and his upcoming visit to China. 

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2DfemZg
via IFTTT

Seeing Pakistani flag, Fakhr-e-Alam served green fish burger in Russia

MOSCOW: Pakistani singer and actor Fakhr-e-Alam, who was detained shortly in Russia after his visa expired, is receiving warm become in his 'Mission Parwaaz' in different countries.Fakhr took to Twitter to share, "Here in Patropolvask #Russia I asked for a fish burger and the guy saw my Pakistani flag and served it in a green bun. Such is the kind of warmth people have #MissionParwaaz #PakistanZindabad.Alam embarked on "Mission Parwaaz" under which he intends to visit 32 different spots around the world during 28 days.The singer and actor got his flying licence in 2015.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2Q6TCpt
via IFTTT

Local train service for Karachi inaugurated

Karachi: Local train service has been inaugurated for the labours of for Karachi on the directive of Prime Minister Imran Khan to facilitate the low income people.The train service will be operational from Thursday, November 01 for the general public.President Arif Alvi on Tuesday inaugurated the local train service on Wednesday in Karachi.According to the schedule, the local train will depart from City Station at 7:00 am and 5:45 pm, and go through seven stations including Cannt, Drigh Road, Malir City, Landhi, Bin Qasim and Dhabeji.Railways administration said the train ticket will cost between Rs25 to Rs80. Railways Minister Sheikh Rasheed was also present on the occasion.The minister has said that that the basic purpose of the train is to facilitate the labours and overcome the rush on roads of Karachi.  

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2Q8J35g
via IFTTT

Bilawal Bhutto voices support for Supreme Court after landmark Asia Bibi verdict

ISLAMABAD: PPP chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari has put his weight behind the Supreme Court of Pakistan after its landmark judgment in Asia Bibi case.Bibi, a Christian mother of five, was acquitted by a three-member apex court bench on Wednesday morning. "The Supreme Court is our national institution. All other institutions, including the National Assembly, should stand with the Supreme Court," he said in a statement."We cannot run the country from the streets. We can [only] run this country according to the Constitution and law," he said as he became the first top political leader to comment on the sensitive issue. Senator Sherry Rehman and Senator Farhatullah Babar have also welcomed the judgment in Twitter statements. Asia Bibi, a Catholic mother of five, was condemned to death in 2010 on charges of blasphemy. Her appeal against the convicted was rejected by the Lahore High Court in 2014. Shortly after the verdict, TLP supporters took to the streets in many cities to protest the court’s verdict. Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) and Jamaat-i-Islami's (JI) Islamabad chapter also issued a call for protest against the verdict.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2qnnYJf
via IFTTT

Malala Yousafzai to be honoured with Harvard Leadership Award

A crusader for girl’s education, Malala Yousafzai in 2014, became the youngest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize at the age of 17 in recognition of her efforts for children's rights. Photo: Reuters CAMBRIDGE: Nobel prize winner Malala Yousafzai will receive the 2018 Gleitsman Award from the Center for Public Leadership at Harvard Kennedy School.Yousafzai, a girls’ education activist, is being honoured with the award for her global movement to equip girls with 12 years of free, quality and safe education.The award will be handed over to Yousafzai, 21, at a public ceremony at Harvard Kennedy School on December 6, 2018.“Malala speaks powerfully to the strength and perseverance of women and girls who are oppressed,” David Gergen, professor of public service at Harvard Kennedy School and director of the Center for Public Leadership said.He added, “Her remarkable story has inspired girls — and boys as well — to follow in her footsteps and has activated a generation of practitioners and legislators who are fighting for equality in their own communities.”Gergen continued, "Alan Gleitsman, whose philanthropy made this award possible, believed in individuals whose vision inspired others to confront injustice."“He was an ardent supporter of Harvard Kennedy School’s efforts to cultivate the world’s youngest change makers and would be so pleased by today’s announcement,” the professor added.At the age of seventeen, Malala had become the youngest Nobel laureate, owing to her efforts for children’s rights in 2014.Yousafzai’s struggle went globally recognized after she had survived a head shot at point-blank range by Taliban gunmen as she was returning from her school in Swat Valley— a region unsafe for girls' education during the time of incident.  

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2qmysso
via IFTTT

PM Imran Khan's China visit schedule changed

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan's schedule for China visit has changed and now the Premier will travel to  Beijing from November 01 to 05.Pm Khan will be accompanied by a high-level delegation including the Minister of Foreign Affairs.Earlier, PM Imran Khan was to travel to China on November 02 at the invitation of the Chinese leadership and discuss whole range of bilateral issues besides inking a number of agreements, the Foreign Office had announced.During the visit, Prime Minister Imran Khan will hold meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang and review the entire range of bilateral relations which have enjoyed a long history of mutual trust and mutual support.This will be the first official visit of the Prime Minister to China after assuming office in August 2018. He will be accompanied by a high-level delegation including the Minister of Foreign Affairs. The visit signifies the closeness and traditional warmth which characterizes Pakistan-China all weather strategic cooperative partnership. Both sides will sign several Agreement/MoU of Cooperation in diverse fields, the Foreign Office said.After his visit to Beijing, the Prime Minister will visit Shanghai to participate in First China International Import Expo in Shanghai, where Pakistan is exhibiting a wide range of export products. Prime Minister will be a key note speaker at the inauguration of the Expo. On the sidelines of Shanghai Forum, Prime Minister will hold meetings with other world leaders. He will also hold meetings with leaders of Chinese financial and corporate sector.The traditionally close, cooperative and friendly ties between Pakistan and China are based on shared principles and mutual interests entailing close cooperation in diverse fields. Both countries maintain close and regular strategic communication for promotion of regional peace and stability and economic cooperation. Economic and industrial cooperation between Pakistan and China expanded significantly after the establishment of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.Prime Minister’s visit is expected to provide further impetus to enhancing the existing strategic ties between Pakistan and China and break new grounds for broadening the bilateral partnership.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2OY6H80
via IFTTT

Asia Bibi: the Pakistani Christian acquitted of blasphemy

Islamabad -For the majority of Asia Bibi´s life she lived in obscurity like many of Pakistan´s downtrodden Christian minority, until a blasphemy allegation saw her sentenced to death in a case that divided the nation.She was thrust into the spotlight in deeply conservative Pakistan, where even unsubstantiated accusations of disrespecting Islam can provoke death at the hands of mobs.The allegations against Bibi date back to 2009, when Muslim field labourers who were working alongside refused to share water with her because she was Christian.An argument broke out and a Muslim woman later went to a local cleric and accused Bibi of committing blasphemy against the Prophet Mohammed (PUBH) -- a charge punishable by death under legislation that rights groups say is routinely abused to target religious minorities and settle personal scores.Bibi was convicted and sentenced to hang in 2010, despite her advocates maintaining her innocence and insisting the argument was a personal dispute.The illiterate, Christian mother has been behind bars in a prison in central Pakistan´s Multan ever since, spending years in a cramped windowless cell during periods of solitary confinement.Her husband Ashiq Mesih told AFP earlier this year that life in their home country was a struggle for the family under the blasphemy laws."Living in Pakistan for us is very difficult. We don´t go out of our home and if we go, we come out very carefully," he said.Their daughters Esham and Esha, who is mentally and physically disabled, were forced to to live away from their father for some time over safety fears.- ´Justice prevailed´ -Bibi´s plight drew the attention of international rights groups and quickly evolved into the most high-profile case in the country, with Pope Benedict XVI calling for her release in 2010.Her case was also championed by liberal provincial governor Salmaan Taseer, who spoke out in support of Bibi and against intimidation by religious hardliners in repeated television appearances.Taseer later gunned down in broad daylight in Islamabad in 2011 by one of his own bodyguards who cited the governor´s position on reforming the country´s blasphemy laws as the motive.The state hung his assassin Mumtaz Qadri in 2016 in a Supreme Court decision that was hailed by progressives, but brought hardliners into the streets supporting Qadri and demanding Bibi´s death.For years, Bibi, who has asthma, continued to languish in prison even after her appeal reached the Supreme Court in 2014.On Wednesday, Pakistan´s chief justice said her conviction had been "reversed".Leading rights groups welcomed the decision even as religious extremists launched protests across the country and swarmed the streets in Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi closing down key roads."This is a landmark verdict," said Omar Waraich, Deputy South Asia Director at Amnesty International."Justice has finally prevailed. The message must go out that the blasphemy laws will no longer be used to persecute the country´s most vulnerable minorities."Bibi was set for immediate release following the Supreme Court´s ruling. However, officials had yet to say if there was any security arrangements for her protection or if she was planning to leave Pakistan.Freedom in Pakistan for Bibi would likely mean a life under threat by hardliners who have long called for her death.But even with an uncertain future, Bibi says the acquittal was an answered prayer."I had dreamed that the walls of the prison are falling apart," Bibi told AFP by phone. "I can´t believe it."

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2CSrt1F
via IFTTT

British-Pakistani boxer Amir Khan, wife Faryal Makhdoom meet PM Imran

British-Pakistani boxing sensation Amir Khan and his wife Faryal Makhdoom have met with Prime Minister Imran Khan.On Wednesday, Faryal Makhdoom posted a picture on Twitter showcasing her along with husband Amir standing beside the premier, captioning it as: “Pleasure meeting @ImranKhanPTI today in Islamabad, Pakistan.”

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2zeEuPK
via IFTTT

Asia Bibi case: Live traffic updates on Google Map in Islamabad

ISLAMABAD: Protests broke out in major cities across the country following the Supreme Court verdict acquitting Asia Bibi from the blasphemy charges.The protesters have blocked several main thoroughfares of the city suspending traffic.Here’s the Google Map showing live traffic status across the city. The roads marked as red are those where massive traffic disruption is reported while green lines can be followed for hassle free drive to your destination.Red circles mention that the traffic is blocked at those points.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2Psnekf
via IFTTT

Asia Bibi case: Live traffic updates on Google Map in Lahore

ISLAMABAD: Protests broke out in major cities across the country following the Supreme Court verdict acquitting Asia Bibi from the blasphemy charges.The protesters have blocked several main thoroughfares of the city suspending traffic.Here’s the Google Map showing live traffic status across the city. The roads marked as red are those where massive traffic disruption is reported while green lines can be followed for hassle free drive to your destination.Red circles mention that the traffic is blocked at those points.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2SyK6Nu
via IFTTT

Asia Bibi case: Live traffic updates on Google Map in Karachi

ISLAMABAD: Protests broke out in major cities across the country following the Supreme Court verdict acquitting Asia Bibi from the blasphemy charges.The protesters have blocked several main thoroughfares of the city suspending traffic.Here’s the Google Map showing live traffic status across the city. The roads marked as red are those where massive traffic disruption is reported while green lines can be followed for hassle free drive to your destination.Red circles mention that the traffic is blocked at those points.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2ziAzl7
via IFTTT

Asia Bibi protests: Pillion riding banned in Karachi

KARACHI: The Sindh government has imposed ban on pillion riding in Karachi for 10 days amid protests across city after the Supreme Court verdict acquitting Asia Bibi in a blasphemy case.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2SyFx64
via IFTTT

021: Productivity hacks, getting better at Orangetheory, and the power of “no” with Katy Widrick

Hi friends! I’m so excited for today’s podcast episode because I’m chatting with a good friend of mine and a huge part of the behind-the-scenes magic here on the blog: Katy Widrick. 

When I think of people who are just slaying it at life, Katy is one of the first who come to mind. She does so many different things, does them extremely well, makes time for her health, and is super organized and efficient. For today’s podcast episode, I thought it would be fun to hear some of Katy’s tips for productivity plus chat about fitness, carb cycling, and so.much.more.

Here’s a little bit about Katy:

Katy Widrick is the owner of Make Media Over, a managed services and consulting company for bloggers, businesses and online influencers who are looking to scale up without stressing out. She’s also an Emmy-nominated television and documentary producer, a personal trainer and group fitness instructor and a mom of two. Learn more at makemediaover.com and find Katy on social media @kwidrick. You can also get her FREE 14-day guide to a more efficient life at https://makemediaover.com/efficient.

In this episode we chat about:

– How to stay motivated and organized when you have a lot on your plate

– Tips for getting stronger at Orangetheory

– Carb cycling

– The power of saying “no”

– When to delegate

and how to avoid burnout.

Thank you so much for listening and for all of your support with the podcast! Please leave a rating or review if you enjoyed this episode. If you leave a rating, head to this page and you’ll get a little “thank you” gift from me to you. 

You can listen and subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, Stitcher, and Google Play.

The post 021: Productivity hacks, getting better at Orangetheory, and the power of “no” with Katy Widrick appeared first on The Fitnessista.

from The Fitnessista https://ift.tt/2qiAk58
via IFTTT

Pakistan promised to help recover abducted body guards: Iran

ISLAMABAD: Iran’s foreign minister Javad Zarif on Wednesday said his visit to Pakistan was aimed at further intensifying efforts for the safe recovery of Iranian border guards.In an interview with IRNA after his arrival in Islamabad, the foreign minister said Pakistani officials had promised the Iranian authorities to do their level best to help recover abducted border guards.Zarif termed Iran and Pakistan as strong neighbours and said Tehran valued its ties with Islamabad.He said Iranian authorities were in constant touch with their Pakistani counterparts for the safe recovery of border guards.On October 16, terrorists had kidnapped the Iranian forces including local Basij volunteer forces and border guards near the town of Mirjaveh on the Pakistani border.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2P1yTH5
via IFTTT

Statement was about elements in bureaucracy not judiciary: Fawad

ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Chaudhry Fawad Hussain on Wednesday said that he fully respects the courts and his statement was about balance of power among the institutions and not related to the judiciary.Talking to media after appearing in the Supreme Court, the minister said that he could not even think about insulting the courts and his statement was about some elements in the bureaucracy.Fawad said that there was no option of liking and disliking about the Supreme Court verdict which would definitely be implemented in letter and spirit.He said he had personal relation of regard with the Chief Justice of Pakistan and there would be no compromise on the respect of the superior judiciary.He said that the government was bound to follow the law and the Constitution and was striving to run its affairs in line with the Constitutional parameters.He further said that Prime Minister was the chief executive of country and his policies would be implemented by the government.He said that Azam Swati was a respectable person.To a question, Fawad said that the government was stable and enjoying support of the masses and would fulfill its promises.He said there was no political pressure on the police department in performance of duties.He said that All Parties Conference of Maulana Fazalur Rehmanhas failed even before its meeting.The minister said that Fazalur Rehman was seeing proverbial stars in the day time and Israeli planes at night.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2CQkrKU
via IFTTT

Raza Haroon urges CM Murad to carry consensus in Karachi after Zardari's NA statement

KARACHI:  Pak Sarzameen Party-Secretary General Raza Haroon on Wednesday welcomed former President Asif Ali Zardari’s statement in National Assembly  regarding Karachi’s population being 30 million, and not 25 million contrary to popular belief.Haroon furthermore urged Sindh CM Murad Ali Shah to undertake all efforts within his official capacity to ensure that a census review is carried out without further delay. He also emphasised that accurate census data is essential to guarantee that Karachi gets it due share in distribution of national resources including water, health, education, infrastructure and social development projects.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2zkaHVF
via IFTTT

Ganguly fears for Indian cricket amid #MeToo row

NEW DELHI: Former captain Sourav Ganguly expressed his "deep sense of fear" about the running of Indian cricket as he slammed the sloppy handling of #MeToo allegations against board chief executive Rahul Johri, among other key issues.Johri was accused of sexual harassment on October 12 in an account shared by author Harnidh Kaur on Twitter, and the board´s administrative committee gave him a week to explain.However, the Supreme Court-appointed committee is divided on the issue, with its two members arguing over the course of action against Johri.Ganguly, who heads Bengal´s state cricket association, criticised the functioning of the national board, the richest and most powerful cricket body in the world."I write this mail to you all with the deep sense of fear as to where Indian cricket administration is going," Ganguly wrote to BCCI secretary Amitabh Choudhary, president CK Khanna and treasurer Anirudh Chaudhary, in a letter seen by AFP."I don´t know how far it´s true, but the recent reports of harassment has really made the BCCI look very poorly... more so the way it has been handled," he said.Ganguly, 46, also criticised the board over last year´s appointment of national coach Ravi Shastri, after a selection process that sidelined his predecessor, Anil Kumble.Ganguly, who was part of the advisory panel involved in the selection, along with Sachin Tendulkar and VVS Laxman, had recommended Kumble´s extension after the spin legend was given the job in June 2016.But Kumble decided to resign, citing his "untenable" relationship with skipper Virat Kohli."My experience in the matter of coach selection was appalling (the less said the better)," Ganguly said."Indian cricket with its massive following has been built over the years of hard work from superb administrators and greatest of cricketers who have managed to bring thousands of fans to the ground... I at the present moment think it´s in danger."The BCCI plunged into crisis in January 2017 when Supreme Court judges ordered the dismissal of president Anurag Thakur over the failure to enact a series of recommended reforms.Cricket´s massive popularity in India has helped the BCCI become by far the wealthiest of all of the sport´s national boards, netting massive money from sponsorship and TV deals.But it has also been embroiled in a series of scandals, including accusations of corruption and match-fixing that tarnished the Indian Premier League (IPL) -- the board´s lucrative Twenty20 competition.

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2Sv7Bat
via IFTTT

Shahid Rassam presents fusion of art, poetry in latest exhibit

KARACHI: The fusion of art and Urdu poetry concealing strong messages  behind it, came alive on canvas through Shahid Rassam’s powerful and artful strokes in his latest exhibit redefining the word ‘kafir’, here on Tuesday evening.The acclaimed Pakistani artist’s exhibit opened at Karachi’s Sannat Art Gallery, attracting a hefty number of art enthusiasts, critics and prominent dignitaries, who took in the striking spirit of reinventing the term ‘kafir’ [apostate], as an act of resistance that stands as his own take at revolutionizing the world and identifying the damages in society.Talking to The News, Rassam opened up about the masterpieces on display and what they define, saying: “Ghalib is the consistent source of inspiration behind a lot of the series of my paintings. I find new dimensions in his poetry every time."He went on to say: “You will find male, female, transgender bodies in my work because injustice has no gender. Kafir is someone who is defiant towards the system, individuals, injustice or anything. And since the rapid decline of society is so appalling, I’ve tried to challenge those traditions of society through this series. Previously there had been a lot of acceptance and tolerance in society, people were generally very open-minded. So this wave of intolerance and extremism and narrow-mindedness that has been transplanted in our society, all of this is being challenged through these paintings.”Treading ahead, the artist went on to explain one of the more striking parts of the display showcasing wall clocks: “These are called ‘Kaafir Ghariyan’, these stand as a symbol of time being defiant. The hands of all these clocks you will find, are broken. Except for that seconds'  hand which is a symbol of revolution.” One of the city’s most prominent art critic, Marjorie Husain expressed her reverence of the masterpieces around her, saying: “It’s very astonishing work. The details are just so immaculate. And the deep meaning that he has given to his work, it needs a lot of going into it requires a lot of thought to go into it.”Moreover, acclaimed Pakistani actor Munawar Saeed also appeared swayed by the blend of art and poetry saying: “Shahid Rassam has been brilliant since the start. And this work in front of us has been executed through utmost hard work and brilliance. Understanding the brilliance of these masterpieces is a challenge and when you understand, then that is when you completely relish over the beauty of the art and the themes it represents.”On the other hand, media bigwig Athar Waqar Azeem also commented saying: “I was wondering how many people would be actually able to comprehend the idea behind the paintings. That is when Shahid told me that I didn’t paint this for everyone. This is only for those people who are able to comprehend and interpret the layers of messages concealed behind the basic surface of the painting. After a very long time I’ve seen an exhibition in Karachi that made me realize that yes, the art streak in Karachi is still alive.”

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2zi3lSH
via IFTTT

Asia Bibi case: Justice Asif Saeed Khosa's additional note

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court Wednesday overturned the conviction of Asia Bibi, a Christian mother facing execution for blasphemy, in a landmark case which has incited deadly violence and reached as far as the Vatican.Bibi appeared to be in state of disbelief after hearing that Pakistan’s Chief Justice Saqib Nisar had quashed her conviction nearly eight years after she was first sentenced to death."I can't believe what I am hearing, will I go out now? Will they let me out, really?" Bibi told AFP by phone from prison after the ruling."I just don't know what to say, I am very happy, I can't believe it."Demonstrations broke out in major cities across the country following the verdict, with approximately a thousand club-wielding demonstrators blocking Islamabad’s main highway as several roads in the port city of Karachi were barricaded by protesters sparking chaotic traffic jams.Justice Asif Saeed Khosa also penned down an additional note on the verdict, which is being reproduced here: Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, J.: I have had the privilege of perusing the proposed judgment authored by my lord the Hon’ble Chief Justice and I agree with the reasons recorded and the conclusions reached therein. However, because of some important legal and factual issues involved in the case I have decided to record this separate concurring opinion. 2. Mst. Asia Bibi appellant had allegedly made some derogatory remarks against the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) and the Holy Qur’an on 14.06.2009 in the presence of some of her Muslim female co-workers while plucking Falsa (a kind of berry also known as grewia asiatica) in the field of one Muhammad Idrees in village Ittanwali in the area of Police Station Sadar, Nankana Sahib and for that alleged commission of the offence of blasphemy under section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (P.P.C.) she was booked in case FIR No. 326 registered at the said Police Station on 19.06.2009 at the instance of Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant, an Imam of the local mosque. It was alleged that the appellant had stated something to the effect that the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) had fallen ill and was bedridden for one month before his death, insects had emerged from his mouth and ear, he had got married to Hazrat Khadija (May Almighty Allah Be Pleased With Her) with the intention to loot her wealth and after looting her wealth he had discarded her. It was also alleged that on the same occasion the appellant had also uttered words to the effect that the Holy Qur’an was not a book of God and it was not a divine book but a self-made book. The appellant was arrested by the local police on 19.06.2009 soon after registration of the FIR and upon completion of the investigation a Challan was submitted before the trial court recommending her trial. The trial court framed a Charge against the appellant for an offence under section 295-C, P.P.C. to which she pleaded not guilty and claimed a trial. During the trial the prosecution produced seven witnesses in support of its case against the appellant and produced some documents and statement of a Court Witness was also recorded by the trial court. In her statement recorded under section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Cr.P.C.) the appellant denied and controverted all the allegations of fact leveled against her by the prosecution and professed her innocence. She opted not to make a statement on oath under section 340(2), Cr.P.C. and did not produce any evidence in her defence. Upon completion of the trial and after hearing of arguments of the learned counsel for the parties the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nankana Sahib trying the case convicted the appellant for the offence under section 295-C, P.P.C. vide judgment dated 08.11.2010 and sentenced her to death and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/-or in default of payment thereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. The appellant challenged her conviction and sentence before the Lahore High Court, Lahore through Criminal Appeal No. 2509 of 2010 which was heard by a learned Division Bench of the said Court along with Murder Reference No. 614 of 2010 seeking confirmation of the sentence of death passed by the trial court against the appellant and vide judgment dated 16.10.2014 the appellant’s appeal was dismissed, her conviction and sentence recorded by the trial court were upheld and confirmed and the Murder Reference was answered in the affirmative. Hence, the present appeal by leave of this Court granted on 22.07.2015. 3. Leave to appeal had been granted by this Court in order to reappraise the evidence and we have undertaken that exercise by perusing the record of the case from cover to cover with the assistance of the learned counsel for the parties. We have also carefully heard and considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties. 4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the appellant that an FIR in respect of the alleged occurrence had been lodged by Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) with a delay of five days and it had been admitted by the complainant before the trial court that before lodging of the FIR deliberations had taken place amongst the members of the complainant party which delay and deliberations had denuded the FIR of its evidentiary value, as held by this Court in the case of Iftikhar Hussain and others v The State (2004 SCMR 1185). He has also argued that the prosecution witnesses had differed with each other over the place where the FIR had been lodged and the Advocate who had drafted the application for registration of the FIR had never been named. He has further argued that two independent prosecution witnesses had confirmed that a quarrel had taken place between the appellant and the ladies belonging to the complainant party before the offending words had allegedly been uttered by the appellant but the prosecution witnesses belonging to the interested complainant party had completely suppressed such an important fact. It has also been argued by him that no independent corroboration was available confirming the allegations leveled against the appellant by the crucial prosecution witnesses appearing before the trial court, i.e. Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3). According to him the investigation of this case was conducted by an officer who was not competent to investigate this case as required by section 156-A, Cr.P.C. and in support of this contention he has relied upon the cases of Shaukat Ali v The State and others (2008 SCMR 553), Amjad Farooq and another v The State (2007 P.Cr.L.J. 238) and Malik Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri v The State and others (PLD 2016 SC 17). He has also submitted that it was alleged in the FIR that the appellant was a preacher of Christian faith which formed the motive in this case but no such assertion was made before the trial court by any prosecution witness during the trial. He has pointed out that none of the other female co-workers of the appellant working in the same field of Falsa was produced by the prosecution in support of its case against the appellant and, thus, the best evidence had been withheld by the prosecution and on account of such failure of the prosecution an adverse inference is to be drawn against it. With these arguments the learned counsel for the appellant has maintained that the case of the prosecution against the appellant was full of serious doubts and the benefit of such doubts ought to be extended to her. 5. As against that the learned Additional Prosecutor-General, Punjab appearing for the State has maintained that investigation of a case by a police officer not competent to investigate such case does not vitiate the investigation and in support of this argument he has referred to the provisions of section 156(2), Cr.P.C. He has submitted that the statements made before the trial court by Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) were quite consistent and their statements had found sufficient support from the statements made by Muhammad Idrees (CW1) and Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) (PW6). It has, thus, been maintained by him that the prosecution had succeeded in proving its case against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. 6. While opposing this appeal and supporting the appellant’s conviction and sentence recorded and upheld by the courts below the learned counsel for the complainant has argued that delay in lodging of an FIR is not always fatal to a criminal case and in the present case the delay stood sufficiently explained by the prosecution. He has relied in this regard upon the cases of Zar Bahadar v The State (1978 SCMR 136) and Sheraz Asghar v The State (1995 SCMR 1365). He has also argued that both the courts below had concurred in their findings and had found the appellant guilty as charged and such concurrent findings of the courts below are not be interfered with lightly. He has pointed out that in her statement recorded under section 342, Cr.P.C. the appellant had not disputed her presence in the relevant field of Falsa at the date and time of occurrence and she had also admitted having some verbal interaction with her female co-workers, including Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3), on that occasion and no suggestion was made to those witnesses during their cross-examination that the allegations leveled by them regarding commission of blasphemy by the appellant were incorrect. According to the learned counsel for the complainant an assertion of fact by a witness is deemed to have been admitted by the opposite party if the witness is not controverted regarding such assertion through a suggestion during his cross-examination. He has also submitted that the appellant had made multiple extra-judicial confessions about her guilt before different prosecution witnesses who had consistently deposed about the same before the trial court. In the end he has argued that the prosecution witnesses had no ostensible reason to falsely implicate the appellant in a case of this nature, their consistent statements had inspired confidence of the courts below and, therefore, the appellant’s conviction and sentence recorded and upheld by the courts below do not warrant any interference by this Court.7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the record of the case with their assistance I have observed that the prosecution had produced seven witnesses in support of its case against the appellant. Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant had appeared before the trial court as PW1 and had deposed about having been informed about the incident by three ladies, holding of a public gathering on 19.06.2009 wherein the appellant had allegedly confessed her guilt and had asked for forgiveness and lodging of the FIR by him on 19.06.2009. Mafia Bibi (PW2) had deposed about the incident taking place in the field of Falsa on 14.06.2009, informing the complainant about that incident and holding of a public gathering on 19.06.2009 wherein the appellant had allegedly made a confession and had sought pardon. Asma Bibi (PW3) had also made a statement regarding the same events which were stated by Mafia Bibi (PW2). Muhammad Afzal (PW4) had stated about having been informed by Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1), Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) about the blasphemy allegedly committed by the appellant and holding of a public gathering on 19.06.2009 wherein the appellant had allegedly admitted her guilt and had sought forgiveness. Muhammad Rizwan, SI (PW5) had recorded the formal FIR at the Police Station. Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) had appeared as PW6 and had stated about the investigation of this case conducted by him. Muhammad Arshad, SI (PW7) was the initial investigating officer of this case and he had stated about inspecting the place of occurrence on 19.06.2009, recording of statements of witnesses, arresting the appellant, obtaining her judicial remand from a Magistrate and sending her to the judicial lock-up. Some documents were also produced by the prosecution before the trial court in support of its case. The trial court summoned and recorded the statement of Muhammad Idrees as CW1 who claimed to be the owner of the Falsa field wherein the occurrence had allegedly taken place and he also stated about the appellant confessing her guilt before him on 14.06.2009, the complainant being informed about the incident, holding of a public gathering on 19.06.2009 and the appellant allegedly confessing her guilt before that gathering and also before the investigating officer on that day. In her statement recorded under section 342, Cr.P.C. while answering a question as to why the present case was registered against her and as to why the prosecution witnesses had deposed against her the appellant had stated as follows: “I am married woman having two daughters. My husband is a poor labourer. I used to pluck Falsa from the plants of Muhammad Idrees along with number of ladies on the daily wages basis. On the alleged day of occurrence, I along with number of ladies were working in the fields. Both the ladies Mst. Mafia Bibi and Mst. Asma Bibi PWs quarreled with me over fetching water which was offered by me to bring for them but they refused saying that since I am Christian, so, they never took water from the hand of Christian. Over this, quarrel was insued and some hot words were exchanged between myself and the PWs ladies. The PWs then approached Qari Salaam complainant through his wife who remained teaching the both ladies, hence, the PWs were conspiring with Qari Salaam got a false, fabricated and fictitious case against me. I offered my oath to police on Bible that I had never passed such derogatory and shameful remarks against the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and the Holy Quran. I have great respect and honour to the Holy Prophet (PBUH) as well Holy Quran and since police had conspired with the complainant, so, the police has falsely booked me in this case. The PWs are real sisters and interested to falsely involve me in this case as they felt disgrace and dishonor on the basis of altercation and hard words extended to them. Qari Salaam complainant is also interested person and both the ladies remained teaching Holy Quran from his wife. My forefathers are living in this village since creation of Pakistan. I am also about 40 years old and since the alleged occurrence, no complaint likewise this never exist against me. I am uneducated and no priest of Christian. So much so there is no church of the Christian in the village, so, being ignorant of any Islamic thought, how can I use such clumsy and derogatory remarks against the beloved Prophet (PBUH) of Allah and the Divine book viz Holy Quran. PW Idrees is also a interested witness who has close family links with their above said ladies.” The appellant had opted not to make a statement on oath under section 340(2), Cr.P.C. and had not produced any evidence in her defence. 8. I now proceed to evaluate every piece of evidence produced by the prosecution in the sequence of events statedly unfolding in this case.9. Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) were produced by the prosecution as witnesses of the incident allegedly taking place in the field of Falsa on 14.06.2009. The said ladies were young girls and sisters inter se and were semi-literate who had statedly received some elementary religious education in their village from the wife of Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1). Those ladies had never stated as to who was addressed by the appellant at the time of uttering the derogatory remarks, they had never disclosed in whose field of Falsa the alleged incident had taken place and they had not themselves lodged any report about the same with the local police. It is of critical importance to mention here that the senior investigating officer of this case namely Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) (PW6) as well as the owner of the relevant field of Falsa namely Muhammad Idrees (CW1) had categorically stated before the trial court that the derogatory words were uttered by the appellant when there was a religious discussion between the appellant and her Muslim co-workers in the field of Falsa after Mafia Bibi (PW2), Asma Bibi (PW3) and other Muslim co-workers had stated that they would not drink water from the hands of the appellant who was a Christian by faith. According to the said witnesses it was on the basis of the said stance of the appellant’s Muslim co-workers that a “quarrel” had taken place and during the said quarrel the appellant had uttered the derogatory words against the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) and the Holy Qur’an. This shows that, according to the prosecution itself, the appellant had uttered the derogatory words attributed to her after the appellant’s religion was insulted and her religious sensibilities had been injured by her Muslim co-workers including Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3). It is unfortunate that in the FIR lodged by Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) and in their statements made before the police under section 161, Cr.P.C. no mention was made by Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1), Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) regarding any such verbal exchange or quarrel. It is also disturbing to note that both Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) had completely suppressed this factual aspect of the case in their examinations-in-chief before the trial court and when it was suggested to them by the defence during their cross-examination they simply denied any such verbal exchange and the ensuing quarrel. It is, thus, obvious that both Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) had no regard for the truth and they were capable of deposing falsely and also that the said semi-literate young sisters had a reason to level allegations against the appellant which could be untrue. I propose to comment on this aspect of the case from another angle as well in the later part of this opinion. 10. Muhammad Idrees had appeared before the trial court as CW1 and he had not been produced by the prosecution but was summoned by the trial court as a Court Witness. He claimed that he was the owner of the relevant field of Falsa, he had gone to his field of Falsa on 14.06.2009 and he was informed by Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) at the spot about an altercation taking place between those ladies and the appellant whereafter the appellant had made a confession before him and had sought pardon. Muhammad Arshad, SI (PW7) had stated that the place of occurrence was the field of Falsa belonging to Muhammad Idrees (CW1) and Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) (PW6) had stated that Muhammad Idrees (CW1) was attracted to the field and the ladies had narrated the matter to him whereafter he inquired from the appellant who confessed before him. I have, however, found that the story about Muhammad Idrees (CW1) being attracted to the spot, being apprised of the incident by Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) and the appellant confessing before him and seeking pardon was a story which was completely new and in their depositions Mafia Bibi (PW2), Asma Bibi (PW3), Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) and Muhammad Afzal (PW4) had not stated anything at all about Muhammad Idrees (CW1) coming to the spot, being apprised of the incident by Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) and the appellant confessing before him and seeking pardon! It appears that Muhammad Idrees (CW1) was introduced in this case at some later stage by way of an afterthought. He had not joined the initial investigation of this case conducted by Muhammad Arshad, SI (PW7) and had not made any statement before him. It was the subsequent investigating officer namely Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) (PW6) who had claimed that Muhammad Idrees (CW1) had appeared before him on 04.07.2009, i.e. after 20 days of the alleged occurrence and after 15 days of registration of the FIR. Such belated surfacing of the said witness was quite suspicious and in all likelihood he had been planted in this case at some subsequent stage. Apart from that the confession allegedly made by the appellant before Muhammad Idrees (CW1) was not put to the appellant at the time of recording of her statement under section 342, Cr.P.C. and the law is settled that a piece of evidence or a circumstance not put to the accused person at the time of recording of his statement under section 342, Cr.P.C. cannot be used or considered against him. The statement made by Muhammad Idrees (CW1) before the trial court is, therefore, to be kept completely out of consideration. 11. The next development allegedly taking place in this case was that Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) was informed about the incident but the evidence brought on the record about that development was also not free from doubt. In the FIR lodged by him the complainant had stated that Mafia Bibi (PW2), Asma Bibi (PW3), Yasmin Bibi and some others had informed him and other people of the village about the incident but in the FIR he had not divulged as to when he was informed about the incident. In his examination-in-chief before the trial court the complainant had stated that he was informed by Mafia Bibi (PW2), Asma Bibi (PW3) and Yasmin Bibi on 14.06.2009 and on that occasion Muhammad Afzal (PW4) and Muhammad Mukhtar Ahmad were also present with him whose presence with him had not been mentioned by him in the FIR. In his cross-examination the complainant had changed his stance and had stated that he was informed about the occurrence on 16.06.2009 (not on 14.06.2009 as stated by him in his examination-in¬chief).12. According to the prosecution the next person informed about the alleged incident was Muhammad Afzal (PW4) but where was he contacted for the purpose was also in doubt. Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) had stated before the trial court that on 14.06.2009 Mafia Bibi (PW2), Asma Bibi (PW3) and Yasmin Bibi came to him and informed him about the incident and on that occasion Muhammad Afzal (PW4) and Muhammad Mukhtar Ahmad were also present with him. However, Muhammad Afzal (PW4) had maintained before the trial court that on 14.06.2009 Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1), Mafia Bibi (PW2), Asma Bibi (PW3), Yasmin Bibi and Muhammad Mukhtar Ahmad came to his house and narrated the occurrence to him. 13. According to the record of the case some steps had been taken by the complainant party before reporting the matter to the police but the ambivalence surrounding taking of such steps was quite noticeable. The alleged occurrence had taken place on 14.06.2009 and the matter was reported to the police on 19.06.2009, i.e. after five days. Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) had initially stated before the trial court that he had been informed about the incident on 14.06.2009 but during the same testimony he had also stated that he had been apprised of the occurrence on 16.06.2009. He had stated before the trial court that between 16.06.2009 and 19.06.2009 he and the people of the village had “investigated and consulted and peeped into the matter” and the matter was reported to the police when they had felt satisfied about correctness of the allegations leveled against the appellant. Muhammad Idrees (CW1) had also stated that Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) had verified the facts from him. It has pertinently been noticed by us that no detail of any such investigation, consultation or peeping into the matter by the complainant party or of verification by the complainant had been divulged before the trial court nor any evidence had been produced in that regard. 14. The next development allegedly taking place in this case was a public gathering convened and held on 19.06.2009 wherein the appellant was summoned and she had statedly made a confession and had sought pardon. I have found that the evidence produced by the prosecution in respect of the said public gathering and about what transpired therein was not only an afterthought but was nothing short of concoction incarnate. The said public gathering was allegedly held at about Noon on 19.06.2009 and an FIR in respect of the alleged commission of blasphemy by the appellant had been lodged by Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) with the local police at 05.45 P.M. on the same day, i.e. 19.06.2009 but it is quite intriguing to note that in the FIR so lodged no mention whatsoever had been made to any public gathering convened or held earlier on the same day or to summoning of the appellant in any such public gathering, making of a confession by her and seeking pardon by her therein! All that was mentioned in the FIR was that on 19.06.2009 Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1), Muhammad Afzal (PW4) and Mukhtar Ahmad had summoned Asma Bibi (PW3), etc. and when the appellant was asked about the incident taking place on 14.06.2009 she confessed and sought pardon. After lodging and registration of the FIR the initial investigating officer namely Muhammad Arshad, SI (PW7) had recorded the statements of Mafia Bibi (PW2), Asma Bibi (PW3) and Muhammad Afzal (PW4) under section 161, Cr.P.C. (Exhibits-DA, DB and DC respectively) on that very day and in those statements the said witnesses had also failed to mention anything about any public gathering convened and held on the same day, summoning of the appellant in such gathering, making of a confession by the appellant or seeking pardon by her therein! 15. The witnesses produced by the prosecution before the trial court in order to prove the convening and holding of the so-called public gathering on 19.06.2009 and summoning of the appellant to that gathering, making of a confession by her and seeking pardon by her therein were Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) and Muhammad Afzal (PW4). The statements made by the said witnesses have, however, been found by me to be mutually contradictory besides having been contradicted by the remaining record of the case. Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) had stated that a public gathering was called in the village on 19.06.2009 but he had failed to mention the time or specific place of its holding. He claimed that in that gathering the appellant had confessed her guilt before him. He had conceded that convening and holding of any public gathering on 19.06.2009 had not been mentioned by him in the FIR (Exhibit-PA) lodged by him later on the same day. He had maintained that in the public gathering the appellant had narrated the occurrence to him and then Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Yasmin Bibi had narrated the occurrence but in her statement made before the trial court Mafia Bibi (PW2) had not said anything about her presence in the public gathering and Yasmin Bibi was not produced by the prosecution before the trial and she had been given up as unnecessary. Although Mafia Bibi (PW2) had stated about a public gathering in her statement made before the trial court yet she had never claimed to be present in any such gathering and, thus, her statement in that regard was nothing but hearsay. She had stated that the public gathering was held after four days of the alleged occurrence which meant that either the public gathering was held on 18.06.2009 and not on 19.06.2009 or the alleged occurrence had taken place on 15.06.2009 and not on 14.06.2009. I have already mentioned above that in her statement made before the police under section 161, Cr.P.C. Mafia Bibi (PW2) had said nothing about any public gathering at all and she was duly confronted with that earlier statement. In her statement made before the trial court Asma Bibi (PW3) had stated about holding of a public gathering but she had failed to mention any date, time or place of holding of such gathering. In her examination-in-chief she had never claimed to be present in the public gathering but in her cross-examination she had stated that she and others had gone to attend the public gathering on their own. It has already been mentioned by me above that in her statement made before the police under section 161, Cr.P.C. Asma Bibi (PW3) had also said nothing about any public gathering at all and she was duly confronted with that earlier statement. Muhammad Afzal (PW4) had stated before the trial court about his presence in the public gathering and about summoning of the appellant to that gathering, making of confession by her in that gathering and her seeking pardon but he was confronted with his earlier statement made before the police under section 161, Cr.P.C. wherein he had said nothing at all about any such public gathering, summoning of the appellant to that gathering, making of confession by the appellant in that gathering and her seeking pardon. Muhammad Idrees (CW1) had also stated before the trial court about the public gathering convened and held on 19.06.2009 and also about what transpired therein but he had admitted in black and white that he was not present in that gathering and he was told about the same by some other persons. His statement about the public gathering and whatever transpired therein was, thus, hit by the rule against hearsay evidence. It may, however, be pointed out that the said witness had maintained that the public gathering was held after two or three days of the alleged occurrence and not after five days as asserted by some other witnesses. 16. Apart from what has been discussed above the evidence produced by the prosecution about where the public gathering had been held, how many people had participated in that gathering, who had brought the appellant to the gathering, how the appellant was brought to the gathering and the time consumed in the meeting has been found by me to be replete with glaring contradictions exposing complete falsity of the said part of the prosecution’s story. As regards the place of holding the public gathering Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) had stated that the public gathering was held in the house of Muhammad Mukhtar Ahmad who was not produced by the prosecution and was given up as unnecessary. He had also stated that the total area of the house of the said Muhammad Mukhtar Ahmad was 5 Marlas. Mafia Bibi (PW2) had stated that the public gathering was held in the house of her father namely Abdul Sattar wherein she and her sister namely Asma Bibi (PW3) also resided. Asma Bibi (PW3) had stated in one breath that the public gathering was held in her house but in the other breath she had stated that the public gathering was held in the house of her neighbour namely Rana Razzaq. Muhammad Afzal (PW4) had maintained that the public gathering was held in the house of Muhammad Mukhtar Ahmad who had not been produced by the prosecution and had been given up as unnecessary. According to Muhammad Idrees (CW1) the public gathering was held at the Dera of Haji Ali Ahmad and not at any other place. The number of persons who had participated in the said public gathering was stated by Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) to be about 100, Mafia Bibi (PW2) had given that figure as more than 1000 including many Ulema and Imams of mosques, according to Asma Bibi (PW3) the number of participants was about 2000 including people of nearby villages and according to Muhammad Afzal (PW4) more than 200/250 people were present in that gathering. Muhammad Idrees (CW1) had stated that many religious scholars were also present in the gathering but he did not know the names of the religious scholars who had participated. If, as stated by Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1), the total area of the house wherein the public gathering had been held was only 5 Marlas then hundreds or thousands of people could not conceivably fit into that very small house. The evidence produced by the prosecution regarding bringing the appellant to the public gathering was equally discrepant and utterly unreliable. According to Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) some residents of the village including one Mudassir had gone on two motorcycles to the house of the appellant and had brought her with them to the public gathering. The said Mudassir was not produced by the prosecution as a witness. Asma Bibi (PW3) had stated that the house of the appellant was situated only three houses away from the place where the public gathering was held and that the appellant was brought there on foot and she also went back on foot. Muhammad Afzal (PW4) had stated that the house of the appellant was situated 200/250 yards away from the house wherein the public gathering had been held and it was one Mushtaq Ahmad who had brought the appellant to the gathering. Later on during the same statement the said witness had maintained that Mushtaq Ahmad had brought the appellant from the field of Falsa. Muhammad Idrees (CW1) had stated that the appellant’s house was situated in front of the Dera whereat the public gathering was held. According to Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) the public gathering lasted for about 15/20 minutes but Muhammad Afzal (PW4) had deposed that the gathering had continued for two to two and a half hours. There was a general consensus among the prosecution witnesses that the public gathering was held on a Friday and it had commenced its proceedings around Noon time. If the proceedings had continued for two to two and a half hours then the participants of the gathering, including some religious scholars and Imams of mosques, might have missed their Friday prayers which was not expected of them!17. According to the prosecution after the public gathering was over Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) had lodged an FIR with the local police on the same day, i.e. 19.06.2009. The circumstances in which the complainant had lodged the FIR were also not free from serious doubts. The original FIR (Exhibit-PA) was in the shape of a written application which had statedly been drafted by an Advocate. The record of this case is completely silent about availability of an Advocate in the village of the parties and nobody had stated anything about the complainant going to any city so as to contact an Advocate and to get an FIR drafted by him. As a matter of fact the complainant had stated before the trial court that he did not even remember the name of the Advocate who had drafted the FIR. The application Exhibit-PA showed that the same was presented by the complainant before Mehdi Hassan, ASI at Pull Nehar Chandarkot (bridge over Chandarkot canal) at 05.45 P.M. on 19.06.2009 when the complainant had met that police officer there while on his way to the Police Station. Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) had, however, stated before the trial court that the application Exhibit-PA was delivered to the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station which was factually incorrect and was belied by the document Exhibit-PA itself. Muhammad Rizwan, SI (PW5) had stated in black and white that on 19.06.2009 the complainant had presented the complaint Exhibit-PA before him at the Police Station and he had then chalked out the formal FIR (Exhibit-PA/1). Even Question No. 6 put to the appellant at the time of recording of her statement under section 342, Cr.P.C. was about the complainant presenting the application Exhibit-PA at the Police Station which was against the record. It was suggested to the complainant by the defence during his cross-examination that the application Exhibit-PA was presented by him before Mehdi Hassan, ASI at Pull Nehar Chandarkot and not at the Police Station but the complainant had categorically denied that suggestion and had maintained that it was incorrect to suggest that the application Exhibit-PA was not presented by him at the Police Station. The complainant had lied in that regard because it had been recorded by Mehdi Hassan, ASI at the bottom of the application Exhibit-PA that the said application had been presented by the complainant before him at 05.45 P.M. on 19.06.2009 at Pull Nehar Chandarkot. This lie told by the complainant could have further been exposed by Mehdi Hassan, ASI but for some undisclosed reason the said police officer was not produced by the prosecution before the trial court. It is quite strange and out of the ordinary that Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1), the initiator of this criminal case, did not remember who had drafted the application Exhibit-PA for the purpose of lodging the FIR and he did not even know where and before whom the said application had been presented by him for the purpose of getting an FIR registered. It, thus, appears that something else was happening behind the scene and the actual movers of the present criminal case were some others who had never come to the fore. Apart from that the FIR had been lodged in this case by Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) who was not present in the incident allegedly taking place in the field of Falsa on 14.06.2009 and who had not himself heard any derogatory remark attributed to the appellant. The FIR lodged by him had not even disclosed as to which female co-worker was being addressed by the appellant when she had allegedly uttered the offending words on the relevant occasion. An FIR lodged with a noticeable delay and after consultations and deliberations loses its credibility and in the present case the FIR had been lodged with an unexplained delay of five days and the complainant had admitted before the trial court that the FIR had been lodged after he and the people of the village had “investigated”, “consulted” and “peeped into the matter”. The complainant and the FIR lodged by him, thus, were not worthy of much credit. 18. The investigation conducted in this case by the police after registration of the FIR had also left much to be desired. Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1) had admitted before the trial court that no permission was obtained from the District Coordination Officer or the District Police Officer, etc. for lodging or registration of an FIR in respect of the offence of blasphemy. The initial investigation of this case was conducted by a Sub-Inspector of Police, i.e. Muhammad Arshad, SI (PW7) which was a violation of section 156-A, Cr.P.C. according to which investigation of such a case could be conducted by an officer not below the rank of Superintendent of Police. After lodging of the FIR it was Muhammad Arshad, SI (PW7) who was entrusted the investigation of the case and it was he who had gone to the place of occurrence, had recorded statements of the witnesses under section 161, Cr.P.C. and had arrested the appellant on the same day, i.e. 19.06.2009. Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) had appeared before the trial court as PW6 and had claimed to have conducted the subsequent investigation of this case after the Deputy Inspector-General of Police/Regional Police Officer, Range Sheikhupura had entrusted the investigation of the case to him on 24.06.2009. That statement of PW6 was factually incorrect because the relevant letter of the Deputy Inspector-General of Police/Regional Police Officer, Range Sheikhupura was dated 26.06.2009 as was evident from the statement of PW6 himself. The said officer had never visited the place of occurrence and had not recorded the statements of witnesses himself. Even the circumstances in which the appellant had been arrested in connection with this case were quite doubtful. Muhammad Arshad, SI (PW7) had stated before the trial court that the appellant had been arrested by him on 19.06.2009 from the appellant’s house. Muhammad Idrees (CW1), however, had a different story to tell in that regard and according to him the religious scholars present in the public gathering had handed over the appellant to the police and the appellant had been arrested at the Dera of Haji Ali Ahmad where the public gathering was held. 19. The argument of the learned counsel for the complainant that some factual assertions made by the prosecution witnesses were deemed to have been admitted by the defence because the prosecution witnesses were not cross-examined regarding those assertions and no suggestion was put to them regarding incorrectness of such assertions has been found by me to be misconceived. In the case of Nadeem Ramzan v The State (2018 SCMR 149) this Court had clarified while referring to the earlier cases of S. Mahmood Alam Shah v The State (PLD 1987 SC 250) and State v Rab Nawaz and another (PLD 1974 SC 87) that “the principle that a fact would be deemed to be proved if the witness stating such fact had not been cross-examined regarding the same was a principle applicable to civil cases and not to criminal cases. It was held that a criminal case is to be decided on the basis of totality of impressions gathered from the circumstances of the case and not on the narrow ground of cross-examination or otherwise of a witness on a particular fact stated by him.” 20. The glaring and stark contradictions in the evidence produced by the prosecution in respect of every factual aspect of this case, noticed by me above, lead to an irresistible and unfortunate impression that all those concerned in the case with providing evidence and conducting investigation had taken upon themselves not to speak the truth or at least not to divulge the whole truth. It is equally disturbing to note that the courts below had also, conveniently or otherwise, failed to advert to such contradictions and some downright falsehood. All concerned would have certainly done better if they had paid heed to what Almighty Allah has ordained in the Holy Qur’an: “O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm for Allah, witnesses in justice, and do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just, that is nearer to righteousness. And fear Allah; indeed, Allah is acquainted with what you do.” (Surah Al-Ma’idah: verse 8) “So follow not [personal] inclination, lest you not be just. And if you distort [your testimony] or refuse [to give it], then indeed Allah is ever, with what you do, acquainted.” (Surah An-Nisa: verse 135) 21. There are indications available on the record that something had transpired between the appellant, a Christian by faith, and her Muslim co¬workers in the field of Falsa on the fateful day and it was in the background of that something that the present allegation regarding commission of blasphemy had belatedly been leveled against the appellant after deliberations spanning over five long days. It is unfortunate that all the four private witnesses produced by the complainant party, i.e. Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1), Mafia Bibi (PW2), Asma Bibi (PW3) and Muhammad Afzal (PW4) had remained completely silent about that something and it were the Court Witness namely Muhammad Idrees (CW1) and the senior investigating officer namely Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) (PW6) who had spilled the beans in that regard and had shown that the boot might in fact be on the other leg! According to the statement made by Muhammad Idrees (CW1) before the trial court he had come to know that before the offending words were allegedly uttered by the appellant a quarrel had taken place between the appellant and the other female co-workers over an issue of fetching water to drink. Elaborating the said quarrel the said witness, owner of the relevant field of Falsa, had disclosed that while working together in that field on the relevant occasion the worker ladies wanted to drink water and the appellant was requested to fetch water but Mafia Bibi (PW2) and Asma Bibi (PW3) said that they would not drink water from the hands of the appellant because she was a Christian. Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) (PW6) had stated before the trial court that it came to his knowledge during the investigation that during a religious discussion between the ladies working together in the field of Falsa on the fateful day a Muslim lady asked for water but when the appellant offered her water the Muslim lady refused to have/drink it from the hand of a Christian lady. He had also confirmed that in his statement recorded under section 161, Cr.P.C. Muhammad Idrees (CW1) had stated that a quarrel had taken place between the appellant and the ladies appearing as prosecution witnesses on the issue of drinking water. The record shows, and it is sad to note, that when taking place of such a quarrel between the appellant and Asma Bibi (PW3) on the issue of drinking water was suggested to the latter by the defence during her cross-examination she had denied that suggestion. The denial of that suggestion by Asma Bibi (PW3) has, however, failed to surprise me because in the FIR, in their statements recorded by the police under section 161, Cr.P.C. as well as in their statements made before the trial court all the private witnesses belonging to the complainant party, i.e. Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant (PW1), Mafia Bibi (PW2), Asma Bibi (PW3) and Muhammad Afzal (PW4) had maintained complete silence over this factual aspect of the case and this fact had come to light only through the statements of a Court Witness and an investigating officer who were both independent witnesses. 22. The above mentioned suppression of a critical fact by the members of the complainant party in fact holds the key to a just, fair and correct decision of the present case. The record of the case shows that the appellant and her forefathers had been living in the same village since before the creation of Pakistan in the year 1947 and during all this while no such incident or quarrel over religions of the parties had ever taken place. It may be advantageous to read again what the appellant had stated in her statement recorded under section 342, Cr.P.C.: “I am married woman having two daughters. My husband is a poor labourer. I used to pluck Falsa from the plants of Muhammad Idrees along with number of ladies on the daily wages basis. On the alleged day of occurrence, I along with number of ladies were working in the fields. Both the ladies Mst. Mafia Bibi and Mst. Asma Bibi PWs quarreled with me over fetching water which was offered by me to bring for them but they refused saying that since I am Christian, so, they never took water from the hand of Christian. Over this, quarrel was insued and some hot words were exchanged between myself and the PWs ladies. The PWs then approached Qari Salaam complainant through his wife who remained teaching the both ladies, hence, the PWs were conspiring with Qari Salaam got a false, fabricated and fictitious case against me. I offered my oath to police on Bible that I had never passed such derogatory and shameful remarks against the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and the Holy Quran. I have great respect and honour to the Holy Prophet (PBUH) as well Holy Quran and since police had conspired with the complainant, so, the police has falsely booked me in this case. The PWs are real sisters and interested to falsely involve me in this case as they felt disgrace and dishonor on the basis of altercation and hard words extended to them. Qari Salaam complainant is also interested person and both the ladies remained teaching Holy Quran from his wife. My forefathers are living in this village since creation of Pakistan. I am also about 40 years old and since the alleged occurrence, no complaint likewise this never exist against me. I am uneducated and no priest of Christian. So much so there is no church of the Christian in the village, so, being ignorant of any Islamic thought, how can I use such clumsy and derogatory remarks against the beloved Prophet (PBUH) of Allah and the Divine book viz Holy Quran. PW Idrees is also a interested witness who has close family links with their above said ladies.” In the backdrop of that statement of the appellant, suppression of the fact by the complainant party about the quarrel over drinking water and confirmation about such quarrel by the Court Witness and the senior investigating officer there are two possibilities which appeal to reason: firstly, the appellant had uttered the offending words after her own religion or religious sensibilities had been insulted and injured by the Muslim co-workers at the spot or, secondly, due to the quarrel taking place between the appellant and her Muslim co-workers at the spot without any offending word having been uttered by the appellant the quarrel was reported by the Muslim ladies to others who then, after deliberating over the matter for five long days, had decided to go after the appellant with a false allegation regarding commission of blasphemy. Both these possibilities require some examination. 23. The statements made by Muhammad Idrees (CW1) and Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) (PW6) before the trial court revealed that the alleged blasphemy had been committed by the Christian appellant after her Muslim co-workers had insulted the appellant’s religion and had injured her religious sensibilities only because she believed in and was a follower of Jesus Christ. According to the Holy Qur’an a Muslim’s faith is not complete till he believes in all the Holy Prophets and Messengers of Almighty Allah including Jesus Christ (Isa son of Maryam) (Peace Be Upon Him) and all the revealed Holy Books of Almighty Allah including the Holy Bible. From that perspective insulting the appellant’s religion by her Muslim co-workers was no less blasphemous. Almighty Allah, the Creator of mankind, knew how a human being whose religion and religious sensibilities are insulted is likely to snap and retort and that is why it was ordained in the Holy Qur’an that “And do not insult those they invoke other than Allah, lest they insult Allah in enmity without knowledge. Thus We have made pleasing to every community their deeds. Then to their Lord is their return, and He will inform them about what they used to do.” (Surah Al-An’am: verse 108) The Muslim co-workers of the appellant had violated the command of Almighty Allah by insulting the Deity believed in and the religion followed by the appellant and, even if the prosecution’s allegations against the appellant were to be accepted as correct, the stated reaction to the same by the appellant was not different from that warned about by Almighty Allah. 24. In view of the glaring contradictions in the evidence produced by the prosecution it has appeared to me to be equally plausible that due to the quarrel taking place between the appellant and her Muslim co¬workers at the spot without any offending word having been uttered by the appellant the quarrel was reported by the Muslim ladies to others who then, after deliberating over the matter for five long days, had decided to go after the appellant with a false allegation regarding commission of blasphemy. If that were so then the Muslim witnesses in this case had violated a covenant of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) with those professing the Christian faith. In his book The Covenants of the Prophet Muhammad with the Christians of the World (published by Angelico Press on 01.09.2013) John A. Morrow has referred to and reproduced many covenants entered into by the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) with people of the Christian faith and one of such covenants is called the Covenant of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) with the Monks of Mount Sinai. It is reported that in or around the year 628 A.D. a delegation from St. Catherine’s Monastery, the world’s oldest monastery located at the foot of Mount Sinai in Egypt, came to the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him), requested for his protection and he responded by granting them a charter of rights. That charter, also known as The Promise to St. Catherine, was translated from Arabic to English language by Dr. A. Zahoor and Dr. Z. Haq as follows: "This is a message from Muhammad ibn Abdullah, as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far, we are with them. Verily I, the servants, the helpers, and my followers defend them, because Christians are my citizens; and by God! I hold out against anything that displeases them. No compulsion is to be on them. Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries. No one is to destroy a house of their religion, to damage it, or to carry anything from it to the Muslims' houses. Should anyone take any of these, he would spoil God's covenant and disobey His Prophet. Verily, they are my allies and have my secure charter against all that they hate. No one is to force them to travel or to oblige them to fight. The Muslims are to fight for them. If a female Christian is married to a Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be prevented from visiting her church to pray. Their churches are to be respected. They are neither to be prevented from repairing them nor the sacredness of their covenants. No one of the nation (Muslims) is to disobey the covenant till the Last Day (end of the world)." The promise made was eternal and universal and was not limited to St. Catherine alone. The rights conferred by the charter are inalienable and the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) had declared that Christians, all of them, were his allies and he equated ill treatment of Christians with violating God’s covenant. It is noticeable that the charter imposed no conditions on Christians for enjoying its privileges and it was enough that they were Christians. They were not required to alter their beliefs, they did not have to make any payments and they did not have any obligations. The charter was of rights without any duties and it clearly protected the right to property, freedom of religion, freedom of work, and security of person. 25. It is unfortunate that while utilizing the sacred concept of Namoos¬e-Risalat (honour and dignity of Prophethood) the above mentioned promise made by the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) to those professing the Christian faith had not been adhered to by his followers in the present case. It appears that after an altercation taking place in the field of Falsa a feast of falsehood had followed and the Muslim members of the complainant party led by Qari Muhammad Salaam complainant had paid little heed to the following command of Almighty Allah in the Holy Qur’an: “O! ye who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah, even as against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor, for Allah can best protect both. Follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest ye swerve, and if ye distort (justice) or decline to do justice, verily Allah is well-acquainted with all that ye do.” (Surah Al-Nisa: verse 135) Even if there was some grain of truth in the allegations levelled in this case against the appellant still the glaring contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution highlighted above clearly show that the truth in this case had been mixed with a lot which was untrue. Even in this regard the Muslim witnesses belonging to the complainant party had ignored what had been ordained by Almighty Allah in the following verse of the Holy Qur’an: “And do not mix the truth with falsehood or conceal the truth while you know [it].” (Surah Al-Baqarah: verse 42) Blasphemy is a serious offence but the insult of the appellant’s religion and religious sensibilities by the complainant party and then mixing truth with falsehood in the name of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) was also not short of being blasphemous. It is ironical that in the Arabic language the appellant’s name Asia means ‘sinful’ but in the circumstances of the present case she appears to be a person, in the words of Shakespeare’s King Leare, “more sinned against than sinning”. 26. For what has been discussed above a conclusion is inescapable and irresistible that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. This appeal is, therefore, allowed, the conviction and sentence of the appellant recorded and upheld by the courts below are set aside and she is acquitted of the charge by extending the benefit of doubt to her. She shall be released from the jail forthwith if not required to be detained in connection with any other case. (Asif Saeed Khan Khosa)Judge 

from The News International - National https://ift.tt/2SB8A99
via IFTTT